The small dictionary of a polemicsman |
|
Order books or Look through the site contents or Let's keep on getting to know each other
«The Appeal to public» — polemic
reception, which essence consists that instead of a substantiation of the
validity or the falsehoods of the considered(examined) thesis begin to influence
feelings of the people, that prevents them to make objective, impartial opinion
on a point of issue. A version « of a reason to the man » (look.). Argument (reason, basis) — the true
judgement resulted(brought) for a substantiation of the validity or a falsehood
of a stated rule(situation) (thesis). The argument is a component of any proof. The argument — a way of a reasonings
ensuring an argumentation and persuasiveness of performance(statement); set of
arguments for the benefit of something. To give reason — to prove, to result
reasons, arguments. «Attack by questions» — polemic
reception consisting that the next statement the polemicsman finishes by a
question to the opponent, forcing it(him) all time to answer questions. «Returnable impact ("«boomerang")
— Polemic reception consisting that any
unreasoned or unfriendly performance(statement), application, retort directed
against somebody, address against the author. Question — the logic form including
the information, and also instruction(indication) on its(her) insufficiency with
the purpose of reception of the new information as the answer. Debate — an exchange of opinions on
any questions; disputes. The demonstration (form, way of the proof)
— a logic reasoning, during which of arguments (reasons) is deduced the
validity or falsehood of the thesis. Demonstration — a component of any
proof. Discussion — dispute, discussion any
of a question at issue at assembly, in a seal, in conversation; public dispute
with the purpose of finding - out of true, presence(finding) of the correct
decision of a question at issue. To discuss — to participate in
discussion, to discuss something, to argue. Disputation — public dispute on a
scientific and public and important theme. Disputman — the person participating
in a disputation, in disputes. «A Reason to the man» — polemic
reception, which essence consists that instead of a substantiation of the
validity or the falsehoods of the considered(examined) thesis begin to estimate
advantages and lacks of the man, his(its) put forward. Argumentation — validity of the
thesis by arguments; major property of a correct reasoning. Argumentation — convincing,
representing the proof. The proof — set of logic receptions
of a substantiation of the validity any of judgement with the help of other
rules(situations), which validity is already established. Irony — the thin sneer expressed in
the latent form. Criticism of reasons of the opponent —
way of a refutations consisting proving, that the arguments of the denied proof
are false or are insolvent. Logomachya — such dispute, when
arguing, not having defined(determined) precisely of subject of dispute, deny
each other or do not agree with each other only because use inexact words for
expression of the ideas; and also dispute, which does not represent anything
essentially important. Maievtics — one of receptions of a
method of the Socrat on an establishment of true. The essence of reception is,
that the Socrat helped « birth think »: with the help of the skilfully put
questions and received answers resulted the interlocutor in true knowledge. «Does not "follow", the logic
mistake in proof consisting «does not "follow" — that the
thesis does not follow, does not follow from arguments, resulted(brought) in his(its)
acknowledgement(confirmation). Validity — important quality of
correct thinking showing that in a reasoning all ideas lean(base) on others,
which validity is proved. The opponent — the person objecting
to somebody in public conversation, disputation and т. Item; the opponent in
dispute. Refutation — the proof of a falsehood
or inconsistency any of the thesis. The refutation of demonstration — way
of a refutations consisting in revealing that the thesis of the opposite party
logically does not follow from arguments. Refutation by the facts — polemic
reception consisting that in the proof of a falsehood or the inconsistencies any
of the thesis are resulted the valid subjects, phenomena, events contradicting
to the thesis. « The Basic error » (false basis) —
a logic mistake in proof consisting that the thesis is proved by false arguments. The answer — the statement, message
caused by a question. « Substitution of the thesis » — a
logic mistake in proof consisting that one thesis deliberately or is not
deliberately substituted by another and this new thesis begin to prove or to
deny. To polemize — to conduct polemic, to
argue. Polemic — dispute during discussion
something; struggle of essentially opposite opinions on this or that question,
public dispute with the purpose to protect to defend the point of view and to
deny opinion of the opponent. Polemicsman — the participant of
dispute. Polemic reception — a way of the
proof either refutation of the validity or falsehood any of a rule(situation). "Vicious circle" — a logic
mistake in proof consisting that the thesis is deduced from arguments, and the
arguments, in turn, are deduced from the same thesis. « An Anticipation of the basis » —
a logic mistake in proof consisting that the thesis leans(bases) on the unproved
arguments. Subject of dispute — of a rule(situation),
judgement, which are subject to discussion by an exchange of the various points
of view, comparison of different opinions. Debate — discussion, public dispute
on any questions. Sarcasm — a venomous sneer, malicious
irony. « The Item of information to absurdity »
— polemic reception, which essence is to show a falsehood of the thesis, as
the consequences following from him(it), contradict the validity. The sothism — logic dodge,
deliberately erroneous reasoning, which is given out for true. The sophisman — the man, which in the
reasonings resorts to sothisms (look). Sophistics — application in dispute
or in the proofs of sothisms; verbal shifts entering in error. Dispute — any collision of opinions,
disagreement in the points of view on any question, subject; the struggle, at
which each of the parties asserts the correctness. The disputman — the man, which argues;
the fan(amateur) of dispute. It is required to prove the thesis —
an idea or rule(situation), which validity. Dodge — cunning, shift; dexterous
reception, with which help want to facilitate dispute for itself and to
complicate for the opponent. Heristics — art to argue to conduct
polemic, using thus by all receptions designed only winning the opponent. Humour — without spiteful and mocking
the attitude(relation) to something. On work L.G. Pavlova. Dispute, discussion, polemic. М., "Education",
1991